![]() ![]() ![]() But we don’t always make our decisions on an objective basis.Īnd if they think they can solve the problem with a subscription or prepaid update plan, they are really begging for trouble, IMHO. That may not be a fair assessment based on an objective look at the capabilities. A 2-year cycle isn’t great for revenue and risks people stinking that the company is falling behind others. Frankly, I’d rather have more frequent upgrades, each being smaller. Cubase Pro 8.5 and Cubase Artist 8. ![]() I believe there are many users who would be happy to pay for a new release every year or so, and don’t require that each release be “the mother of all upgrades”, so to speak. This comprehensive update makes the Cubase experience even more direct and accessible, incorporating enhancements developed at the request of the many professional Cubase users worldwide. Like you, I can’t see how it can make financial sense, without a change in how they collect revenue. Steinberg staff have already explained that the plan is to move away from annual (x.5) paid updates, you’d expect that a 12 month update plan will be the preferred method for perpetual license end users to keep the revenue cycle. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |